Skip to main content

Blog Post #4: Privacy and Biometric Databases

             Our discussions today (Oct. 5, 2017) covered some interesting topics concerning privacy. One of the topics that intrigued me the most was the concern that the new iPhone X’s facial recognition feature would be abused by third party app developers to trick consumers into unwittingly giving up data about themselves (like facial features). As stated in the article cited in class, (“How Apple Will Stop Companies Abusing Facial Recognition on new iPhone X”), Apple isn’t the first company to take up this trend, for Samsung and Microsoft have already released products that integrate facial recognition software. However, since iPhones are enormously popular and are used for a large assortment of apps, people are beginning to fully consider the implications of widely used facial recognition (Roberts). Curious to know if there are any other companies/groups currently invested in the future of facial recognition technology, I did a Google search. Let’s just say that I found more than I bargained for.

              As it turns out, India has already implemented a large-scale biometric system called Aadhaar. According to an article published by the Atlantic, this program was launched in 2009, and has since then collected data on more than one billion people. This data includes names, phone numbers, addresses, iris scans, and photographs (Kolachalam). Further into this article, the author describes how the Indian government has implemented Aadhaar into many social systems, such as banks, schools, and hospitals. Furthermore, the government utilizes the biometric database to optimize its welfare programs and services. At first, enrollment into the system was optional and was mostly intended for the rural citizens of India, since they were less likely to have official legal documents that could be used for identification. Now though, the scope of the program has made it so that enrollment will soon be mandatory if one wants to file taxes, open a bank account, benefit from health-coverage in Karnataka, and generally participate in many other government based projects (Kolachalam).

              Although the Indian government promotes Aadhaar as a solution to several of the social problems the country faces, there are those who see the potential of the system as a tool to establish a surveillance state (Kolachalam). Given the extent and depth of the biometrics being collected and stored, it is easy to see why some are concerned that it would be used to spy on the citizens of India. In fact, I would be surprised if the Indian government wasn’t utilizing Aadhaar as a surveillance tool from time to time. The development and implementation of Aadhaar in India raises some questions, such as: Could a biometric database of this magnitude ever be built in the United States? Would we, the citizens, allow this program to get off the ground? On an initial gut feeling, my answer would be a definite no. The last few days of class have shown that privacy and anonymity online is a greatly debated topic in our country, so I find it extremely unlikely that a project like this would garner much public support; rather, I suspect the opposite would occur. However, upon further thought, I believe that a few decades in the future we could possibly have a system such as Aadhaar in place in the United States.

              I say this for two reasons. The first reason is the same reason the Indian government first developed Aadhaar—efficiency and effectiveness. Its no secret that the U.S. welfare and healthcare systems are in a state of flux. If a digitalized system of identification were developed though, it is quite likely that many of the processes involved in the healthcare and welfare system could be improved. This in turn would save the government thousands, if not millions, of dollars that could be allocated to other areas of interest that could greatly use the additional funding. The second reason is that our society has grown used to convenience, and, if implemented correctly, a biometric database such as Aadhaar has the potential to simplify everyday actions just as the iPhone X will make it easy to unlock your phone just by looking at the camera. Although there are individuals such as myself who prefer to deal with a bit more hassle in exchange for privacy, it appears that society is generally leaning in the opposite direction.

              For these reasons, and probably some others, I believe there is good chance that the United States could see a major biometric database implemented into its societal network. At this moment of time, there is too much debate over privacy on the Internet for the government to rally enough support for this kind of project. However, as the years pass and technology continues to advance (iPhone X’s facial recognition), I believe the likelihood that this program will be implemented in the U.S. greatly increases. What do you think? Will the U.S. develop a biometric database like Aadhaar in the next few decades? Do you see any distant future in which a program like this isn’t part of society?

Sources:

Kolachalam, Namrata. “The Privacy Battle Over the World’s Largest Biometric Database.” The Atlantic, 5 Sept. 2017, https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/09/aadhaar-worlds-largest-biometric-database/538845/ Accessed 5 Oct 2017.


Roberts, Jeff John. “How Apple Will Stop Companies Abusing Facial Recognition of New iPhone X.” Fortune, 23 Sept. 2017, http://fortune.com/2017/09/23/face-id-privacy-iphone-x/ Accessed 5 Oct. 2017. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gamifying Citizenship

The historical context of freedom of speech is an extremely interesting one. Why is it that the concept of free speech has been an undying one and has span the history of human communication. Breaking free speech in to three traditional rationals makes the concept easier to understand and definitely makes sense. These three modes of freedom of speech are philosophical, political and individual. They are easy to distinct from one another and function in completely different ways. From a philosophical level, free speech is a device of truth. That if people are able to speak freely and let their ideas compete, "in the long run the truth will prevail" according to Tedford and Herbeck. I find this interesting, because in my mind, this is the most important facet of free speech. I say this, because I find free speech essential for any kind of societal advancements. If people are not allowed to speak their mind and share their ideas, or discredit others ideas, how is a society supp...

Wedding Cake Court Case (make-up post)

Wedding cake court case involving a gay couple, Charlie Craig & David Mullins, and a cake baker, Jack Phillips, who refused to bake a wedding cake for the couple. Just all around, it's a tricky debate with many different angles due to the baker arguing on the grounds of the First Amendment---its protections for free speech and the free exercise of religion. In the end, I think it comes down to whether we consider baking a cake qualifies an exercise of freedom of expression. I would say that it depends on the situation/context of baking. If Mr. Phillips wants his cake baking to be categorized artistic expression that falls under free expression, he can just go bake a cake on his own. Only then when he's on his own private time does it qualify, but as soon as he offered his skills as a public service via his business, I'd argue he gave that right to expression up. Also, what's stopping other artisans/professional services to deny services? By Mr. Phillip's logic...

Why is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy

While reading Chapter 15, I got the sense that the book was really coming full circle. In the first week of class, we established a meaning for freedom of speech and that shared meaning allowed us to navigate the classroom together as a classroom and a collective group. Creating a space that also involved mutual respect of opinons but encouraging difference in them as well. This brings me to an article I found about the importance of Freedom of Speech in a democracy. It is a basic human right to be able to express opinions and beliefs in our country. Although that is the main component, just like we established in class the first few weeks, in a government and democracy, Freedom of Speech also consists of the ability to listen to people with difference in opinions. In the article , editor Rachael  Jolly says, “ We are going through a time where people don’t want to be on a panel with people they disagree with. But we should feel comfortable being in a room with people who disagree ...