Skip to main content

Blog Post 6

For many today, freedom of speech can referred to information given and taken away for an example news feed. Trumpians (as they call them) support Trumps big decision to controlling news given to President Trump as well as his supporting. I am referring to #fakenews.
This new reverence of the press is a new scheme to an already well practised idea. Looking back in our books, monarchs, priests, political leaders like the English Parliament used different laws to never talk bad among the authoritarians around their day. As rebels, the colonist fought back to establish the First Amendment giving Freedom to the Press, allowing information to be never control by popular demand (in theory) or authority.

However now, we look at #fakenews and wonder if Trumpians know these relicts as controversy. Other authorians like Kim Jung Un control media and intranet in their countries order to control social opinion on the outside and inner world North Koreans live in. Of course between North Korean’s and American government are nothing similar the idea still lurks how can #fakenews be nothing different than from the English Parliament or North Korean imprisonment of knowledge.

Tedford, T., & Herbeck, D. (2017). Freedom of speech in the United States (Eighth ed.). State College, Pennsylvania: Strata Publishing.

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 26, 2017 at 7:52 AM

    Interesting concept. It is weird that trump choose twitter as his platform for speaking to the public. One would have to understand our history in order to understand our present and our future. Putting together trump and the english parliament was a cool thought and the more you think about it the more it makes sense.

    What do you think is the american peoples response....this time?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gamifying Citizenship

The historical context of freedom of speech is an extremely interesting one. Why is it that the concept of free speech has been an undying one and has span the history of human communication. Breaking free speech in to three traditional rationals makes the concept easier to understand and definitely makes sense. These three modes of freedom of speech are philosophical, political and individual. They are easy to distinct from one another and function in completely different ways. From a philosophical level, free speech is a device of truth. That if people are able to speak freely and let their ideas compete, "in the long run the truth will prevail" according to Tedford and Herbeck. I find this interesting, because in my mind, this is the most important facet of free speech. I say this, because I find free speech essential for any kind of societal advancements. If people are not allowed to speak their mind and share their ideas, or discredit others ideas, how is a society supp...
1 comment
Read more

Wedding Cake Court Case (make-up post)

Wedding cake court case involving a gay couple, Charlie Craig & David Mullins, and a cake baker, Jack Phillips, who refused to bake a wedding cake for the couple. Just all around, it's a tricky debate with many different angles due to the baker arguing on the grounds of the First Amendment---its protections for free speech and the free exercise of religion. In the end, I think it comes down to whether we consider baking a cake qualifies an exercise of freedom of expression. I would say that it depends on the situation/context of baking. If Mr. Phillips wants his cake baking to be categorized artistic expression that falls under free expression, he can just go bake a cake on his own. Only then when he's on his own private time does it qualify, but as soon as he offered his skills as a public service via his business, I'd argue he gave that right to expression up. Also, what's stopping other artisans/professional services to deny services? By Mr. Phillip's logic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy

While reading Chapter 15, I got the sense that the book was really coming full circle. In the first week of class, we established a meaning for freedom of speech and that shared meaning allowed us to navigate the classroom together as a classroom and a collective group. Creating a space that also involved mutual respect of opinons but encouraging difference in them as well. This brings me to an article I found about the importance of Freedom of Speech in a democracy. It is a basic human right to be able to express opinions and beliefs in our country. Although that is the main component, just like we established in class the first few weeks, in a government and democracy, Freedom of Speech also consists of the ability to listen to people with difference in opinions. In the article , editor Rachael  Jolly says, “ We are going through a time where people don’t want to be on a panel with people they disagree with. But we should feel comfortable being in a room with people who disagree ...
4 comments
Read more