Skip to main content

Schools Violate Our Freedom of Expression

Freedom of Speech in school is more focused on students than it is on teachers. This freedom under the First Amendment applies to all public institutions, with private schools being exempt because they are not tax supported and not publicly owned and operated. Students in public institutions are systematically protected to have freedom of expression. The first landmark case that showed students rights to freedom of expression happened in 1960's when three students "defied a school board ban on protest activities by wearing black armbands to classes to show their opposition to the Vietnam war (Tedford)". The students were suspended, and went on to sue the federal court under violation of First Amendment rights. The lower courts agreed with the suspensions, so they took it to the Supreme Court who ruled in favor of the three teens and their right to Freedom of Expression.

It is safe to say that a lot of students in public schools, especially high schools do not understand their rights. Public schools do a good job of curving a students rights under the First Amendment. Looking at an exact example of this is the case of Easton Area School District v. B.H. case. "It involved two students in Easton, PA, who were suspended for wearing pink, breast-cancer-awareness bracelets that carried the “boobies” message. The district argued that the bracelets, with their intentionally attention-grabbing message, threatened school“decorum” and “the civility of discussion in the classroom (McCluskey)".  In the appeals court, they ruled in favor of the teens and that punishing them would be violation of their rights. The supreme court stated that schools must put a limit on schools rights for freedom of speech and to "draw a line".

What do you think about this? Do schools have a right to draw a line? It is very much our First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech, so we can express whatever we feel most passionate about without fear of suspension. I do agree, there are some things that people do express that aren't for a greater cause or benefit of anyone else, but at the same time we can't cap what is considered acceptable free speech and what isn't. At the end of the day, we need to know our rights and practice what our country was founded upon.

 Neal McCluskey This article appeared in the Daily Caller on April 4, 2014. “Public Schools Can't Help but Curb Freedom of Expression.” Cato Institute, 4 Apr. 2014, 

www.cato.org/publications/commentary/public-schools-cant-help-curb-freedom-expression.
Tedford, Thomas L., and Dale Herbeck. Freedom of Speech in the United States. Strata Publishing, Inc., 2017

Comments

  1. I believe that schools have the right to enforce policies that control certain expressions and behaviors in order to foster a safe, respectful learning environment. I agree with you that schools, especially high schools, often over step this boundary and take advantage of the students because they do not fully understand their First Amendment rights. However I also believe that it is partially the parents responsibility to understand how school policies interact with First Amendment rights. Instead of recognizing a violation of rights, parents often are upset at the fact their child was suspended rather than fully examining the circumstance. High schools must keep in mind that they are a public institution, rather than a day care, and understand that although they may consider some expressions inappropriate or unruly - these expressions cannot be punished at the expense of the First Amendment rights of a student.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gamifying Citizenship

The historical context of freedom of speech is an extremely interesting one. Why is it that the concept of free speech has been an undying one and has span the history of human communication. Breaking free speech in to three traditional rationals makes the concept easier to understand and definitely makes sense. These three modes of freedom of speech are philosophical, political and individual. They are easy to distinct from one another and function in completely different ways. From a philosophical level, free speech is a device of truth. That if people are able to speak freely and let their ideas compete, "in the long run the truth will prevail" according to Tedford and Herbeck. I find this interesting, because in my mind, this is the most important facet of free speech. I say this, because I find free speech essential for any kind of societal advancements. If people are not allowed to speak their mind and share their ideas, or discredit others ideas, how is a society supp...

Wedding Cake Court Case (make-up post)

Wedding cake court case involving a gay couple, Charlie Craig & David Mullins, and a cake baker, Jack Phillips, who refused to bake a wedding cake for the couple. Just all around, it's a tricky debate with many different angles due to the baker arguing on the grounds of the First Amendment---its protections for free speech and the free exercise of religion. In the end, I think it comes down to whether we consider baking a cake qualifies an exercise of freedom of expression. I would say that it depends on the situation/context of baking. If Mr. Phillips wants his cake baking to be categorized artistic expression that falls under free expression, he can just go bake a cake on his own. Only then when he's on his own private time does it qualify, but as soon as he offered his skills as a public service via his business, I'd argue he gave that right to expression up. Also, what's stopping other artisans/professional services to deny services? By Mr. Phillip's logic...

Why is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy

While reading Chapter 15, I got the sense that the book was really coming full circle. In the first week of class, we established a meaning for freedom of speech and that shared meaning allowed us to navigate the classroom together as a classroom and a collective group. Creating a space that also involved mutual respect of opinons but encouraging difference in them as well. This brings me to an article I found about the importance of Freedom of Speech in a democracy. It is a basic human right to be able to express opinions and beliefs in our country. Although that is the main component, just like we established in class the first few weeks, in a government and democracy, Freedom of Speech also consists of the ability to listen to people with difference in opinions. In the article , editor Rachael  Jolly says, “ We are going through a time where people don’t want to be on a panel with people they disagree with. But we should feel comfortable being in a room with people who disagree ...