Skip to main content

Blog Post 10

The freedom of speech is necessary for democracy. The freedom of speech allows the facilitation of free and open discussion, promotes citizen participation in the political process, and supports freedom of press. (Tedford & Herbeck, 2017) The press functions in many ways to preserve democracy.  One of the most important functions is to serve as a "watch dog". The average citizen does not have the time or the resources required to stay updated on the latest policies, announcements, actions, etc. the press is a powerful medium that facilities communication and awareness between the two.  The press has access to information that a large majority of citizens do not and it is necessary that we have the ability to circulate this information. The press can serve as a "powerful antidote" to remedy any abuses of power and also play a large role in elections as well. 

Because of the important role the press plays it is easy to see why it is alarming that President Trump often engages in anti-press rhetoric and targets certain media outlets. Trump's attacks on the media have inspired other foreign leaders to criticize the media within their countries as well. This can be extremely dangerous in countries that already  lack freedom of speech protections. In many other countries, journalists can face prosecution, jail time, and violence for reporting critically on the government. (Grynbaum, 2017) Many media outlets and government officials have openly criticize Trump for his antics against the media. “Trump’s eagerness to win the favor of autocrats remains one of the most concerning aspects of his presidency,” said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist and communications director for Senator Marco Rubio’s presidential bid. “If the leader of the free world does not champion the free press, then who will?” (Grynbaum, 2017)

How the media and the American public responds to Trump's war against the media has important implications for attitudes concerning democracy. Because other foreign leaders are seeing Trump's behavior as a "green light" to further restrict the media in their own countries it is important we remain resilient in criticizing his actions. Protecting the speech rights of the media is crucial to protecting democracy and their political systems. 


                                                         Works Cited

Grynbaum, Michael M. . “Trump and Russia Seem to Find Common Foe: The American Press.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 27 Nov. 2017. Web. 
Tedford, Thomas L., and Dale Herbeck. Freedom of Speech in the United States. Strata Publishing, Inc., 2017.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gamifying Citizenship

The historical context of freedom of speech is an extremely interesting one. Why is it that the concept of free speech has been an undying one and has span the history of human communication. Breaking free speech in to three traditional rationals makes the concept easier to understand and definitely makes sense. These three modes of freedom of speech are philosophical, political and individual. They are easy to distinct from one another and function in completely different ways. From a philosophical level, free speech is a device of truth. That if people are able to speak freely and let their ideas compete, "in the long run the truth will prevail" according to Tedford and Herbeck. I find this interesting, because in my mind, this is the most important facet of free speech. I say this, because I find free speech essential for any kind of societal advancements. If people are not allowed to speak their mind and share their ideas, or discredit others ideas, how is a society supp...

Wedding Cake Court Case (make-up post)

Wedding cake court case involving a gay couple, Charlie Craig & David Mullins, and a cake baker, Jack Phillips, who refused to bake a wedding cake for the couple. Just all around, it's a tricky debate with many different angles due to the baker arguing on the grounds of the First Amendment---its protections for free speech and the free exercise of religion. In the end, I think it comes down to whether we consider baking a cake qualifies an exercise of freedom of expression. I would say that it depends on the situation/context of baking. If Mr. Phillips wants his cake baking to be categorized artistic expression that falls under free expression, he can just go bake a cake on his own. Only then when he's on his own private time does it qualify, but as soon as he offered his skills as a public service via his business, I'd argue he gave that right to expression up. Also, what's stopping other artisans/professional services to deny services? By Mr. Phillip's logic...

Why is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy

While reading Chapter 15, I got the sense that the book was really coming full circle. In the first week of class, we established a meaning for freedom of speech and that shared meaning allowed us to navigate the classroom together as a classroom and a collective group. Creating a space that also involved mutual respect of opinons but encouraging difference in them as well. This brings me to an article I found about the importance of Freedom of Speech in a democracy. It is a basic human right to be able to express opinions and beliefs in our country. Although that is the main component, just like we established in class the first few weeks, in a government and democracy, Freedom of Speech also consists of the ability to listen to people with difference in opinions. In the article , editor Rachael  Jolly says, “ We are going through a time where people don’t want to be on a panel with people they disagree with. But we should feel comfortable being in a room with people who disagree ...