Skip to main content

Post #2

This week I decided to do my post on Donald Trump and Black Athletes and his criticism of them. Defamation and slander is something that has some grey area, because of the current laws don't exactly have anything that pertain to the internet or in some cases tweets. Donald Trump has continually attacked athletes such as Colin Kaepernick, and trying to  tarnish his character and his right to a peaceful protest for what he believes in. Then he goes on to call the rest of the NFL players who join this protest of taking a knee at the national anthem "sons of bitches," Derek Thompson supports this claim through Trump's words  at an Alabama rally "Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, ‘Get that son of a bitch off the field right now, out. He’s fired,”(Derek Thompson, 2017). 
Which was nationally shown and recorder and even published. This also transpired with Trump's criticism of the Golden State Warriors team, who just won an NBA Championship, who's invitation to the White House he had retracted, criticizing Steven Curry through a tweet, which led to many athletes speaking out over the issues that had transpired over those hours. The Golden State Warriors had also released a statement saying that would use the visit to promote "equality, diversity and inclusion" instead of visiting the White House. I think that is also important to not that Tom Brady, a white NFL player, skipped his White House visit and Donald Trump did not say a word, didn't make a speech about and did not even tweet about his absence so in that there is something to be said. 


Retrieved from:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ftw/2017/09/23/what-the-warriors-said-theyll-do-in-washington-dc-instead-of-visiting-the-white-house/105931540/

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/donald-trump-and-the-politicization-of-everything/540915/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy

While reading Chapter 15, I got the sense that the book was really coming full circle. In the first week of class, we established a meaning for freedom of speech and that shared meaning allowed us to navigate the classroom together as a classroom and a collective group. Creating a space that also involved mutual respect of opinons but encouraging difference in them as well. This brings me to an article I found about the importance of Freedom of Speech in a democracy. It is a basic human right to be able to express opinions and beliefs in our country. Although that is the main component, just like we established in class the first few weeks, in a government and democracy, Freedom of Speech also consists of the ability to listen to people with difference in opinions. In the article , editor Rachael  Jolly says, “ We are going through a time where people don’t want to be on a panel with people they disagree with. But we should feel comfortable being in a room with people who disagree ...
4 comments
Read more

Ch 13. Fair Use

            Chapter 13 discusses fair use. The copy right act of 1976 Cleary defines fair use. It states “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship or research does not constitute copyright infringement” (Tedford and Herbeck, 374). Furthermore, this act states four factors of consideration in fair use cases. They are as follows: “(1) the purpose and character of the use is of a commercial nature or for nonprofit educational nature; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work, granting greater protection to fictional works than factual works, and to unpublished works than to published works; (3) the amount of substantiality of the portion uses in relation to the original work as a whole; (4) the effect of the use on the potential marked or value of the copyrighted work” Tedford and Herbeck, 374). We experience fair use almost every day as students, but also...
1 comment
Read more

Gamifying Citizenship

The historical context of freedom of speech is an extremely interesting one. Why is it that the concept of free speech has been an undying one and has span the history of human communication. Breaking free speech in to three traditional rationals makes the concept easier to understand and definitely makes sense. These three modes of freedom of speech are philosophical, political and individual. They are easy to distinct from one another and function in completely different ways. From a philosophical level, free speech is a device of truth. That if people are able to speak freely and let their ideas compete, "in the long run the truth will prevail" according to Tedford and Herbeck. I find this interesting, because in my mind, this is the most important facet of free speech. I say this, because I find free speech essential for any kind of societal advancements. If people are not allowed to speak their mind and share their ideas, or discredit others ideas, how is a society supp...
1 comment
Read more